New Track Record

IndyCar Blog

Are IMS and IndyCar living in the past?

When Mark Miles accepted the job as the new visionary-in-residence at Hulman & Co., he was quick to say that he would evaluate and act in regards to IMS and IndyCar, two of the properties owned by the mothership from Terre Haute.  After a review of the series by an outside consulting firm, Miles will pull the trigger on a new CEO for the IndyCar Series.  At least that’s what he said when interviewed by the IBJ in a December 12 article called “Miles eyes lights for Speedway, postseason for IndyCar.”   If you have not done so already, it is a very revealing portrait of how a big-timer thinks.  And how he thinks is going to determine the course for IndyCar for the next few years.

It is pretty clear that Miles is not really into the whole sacred cow thing.  He is quoted in the article as saying, “The trick is to have a fresh set of eyes come to this and not let the past—in fact, not [being] interested in continually digging up the past—but looking forward and yet doing that in a way that appreciates the culture.”  Now I’m not quite sure what all that actually means, but I think he is not too worried about whose ox  is going to be gored.  If changes need to be made to improve the series or the Speedway, then changes will be made, even if it causes apoplexy among the loyal old fans who have been following the 500 and the series for years.  And let’s face it, as much as some people want Hulman & Co., IMS, and the series to divorce, it is not going to happen.  Just like in some real marriages, IMS and the IndyCar Series will stay together for the kids, particularly those kids that can claim a lineage to Tony Hulman.  And as the kids reach into the fourth and fifth generation, that’s a whole lot of sinecures to be provided.  Miles also notes the family issues in the interview when he says, “In the end, if a venerable firm is going to succeed over time from generation to generation, it has to be a meritocracy.”  In other words, if the relatives needing a job cannot actually, you know, do the job, then you have to find someone who can.  That scenario may have been played out in the third generation of the Hulman family.  It will be fun to watch how this incipient power struggle will play out.  Just think of Jabot Cosmetics and Newman Enterprises from the soap opera The Young and the Restless.  Characters come and go, but the power always comes back to the family.  The power play that will surely happen in the halls of IMS and IndyCar will be revealed to us in bits and pieces as the actors in the drama tell their side of the story to their favorite media members.

A more immediate cause for teeth-gnashing and knee-jerking is the quote about not being interested in digging up the past.  That’s the past that long time fans such as myself revere so much, the past that fans see and feel when they drive along 16th and Georgetown, the past that makes the Indy 500 so iconic.  The truth of the matter is that IMS may be able to sell its past to fans, but the IndyCar Series cannot.  The Speedway actually has a history to sell; the IndyCar Series is just another name for the races that come before and after the 500.  And that’s the problem that must be solved, and I’m pretty sure Mark Miles know that.  The question is how do you build the fan base for the series?  So far, the people in charge have been “all hat, no cattle.”  And that is not a knock on Randy Bernard, even if it sounds like it.  He was trying to move the series in a new direction.  Too many important toes got in his way.

To build the series, Miles, along with his new as-yet-to-be-named IndyCar CEO, has to build a new fan base.  Capturing the old base back is an exercise in futility.  Those old fans have one big problem: they are old.  Unless your business is AARP, you can’t make a new fortune on old fans.  The fan base is shrinking because new open-wheel fans are not being minted.  The love of IndyCar racing is still passed down from parent to child, but that does not create enough new fans.  New fans need to be created outside of the old circle of friends and family.  IndyCar has to attract a next generation of fans who watch movies like Turbo and play video games like Mario KartThe future of the IndyCar Series depends on attracting young fans, not in keeping the old fans happy.  That’s a cold, hard truth.  If the series does not build its fan base, then it will continue to be a niche sport, struggling to remain relevant in a world that will only acknowledge its existence on Memorial Day weekend.  The old-timers have to accept this new reality.  They have no choice.

For many years, Indianapolis was called Naptown, a sobriquet that referenced the languid lifestyle of a town that did not have much going for it except the Indianapolis 500.  Native son Kurt Vonnegut once said of his hometown, “It was the 500-mile Speedway Race, and then 364 days of miniature golf, and then the 500-mile Speedway Race again.”  IndyCar fans should take note of this.  If Mark Miles cannot revive the IndyCar Series and build a new and loyal fan base focusing on a younger demographic, then the series’ remaining fans should start practicing using a putter to roll a small, colored ball into a clown’s mouth.  They won’t have much else to do between Indy 500’s.

Single Post Navigation

6 thoughts on “Are IMS and IndyCar living in the past?

  1. Thanks, this makes the bizarre behavior of IndyCar a little more understandable, especially for those of us who live outside the I-465. The Indy500 and the IndyCar Series are really two different animals and need to be treated that way.”Turbo” will no doubt help cultivate the next generation of Indy500 fans, but may have little impact on the popularity of the series – as it is in real life. The IMSpeedway and the 500 Mile Sweepstakes will continue be popular and relevant; they always have. The folks in charge of The Race can surely rest on their laurels and survive. However, the IndyCar Series is another matter and will take a different approach. Question is, can an IMS/500 mindset somehow shift consciousness and grow the Championship Series as well? Inquiring minds want to know…and personally, I prefer the windmill at miniature golf.

  2. I like the fact you know it’s the 500 Mile Sweepstakes. I wonder if that falls in Miles definition of history to be ignored? The windmill crossed my mind, but the clown seemed apropos.

  3. IMS and IndyCar have been living in the past for years. A fresh set of eyes that doesn’t weep at the mere mention of the Offy is exactly what IMS and IndyCar needs. Very few people watch sports because of what happened 34 years ago. I find all the Salute to the Legends and endless tradition and “because we’ve always done it that way” mindset suffocating at times.

    • I really like the tradition and history of IMS and the Speedway. You can trade on that. It’s part and parcel of what Indy is. All those Offys and roadsters were the cutting edge of technology at the time. It’s ironic that current rules meant to cut costs also stifle the innovation that IndyCar racing has always been about. The problem is that the series in general cannot trade on the same history. The series needs the new blood and new fans. To keep those new fans, their “new” favorite drivers need to become legends at some future time.

  4. brickyard1911 on said:

    I think (or hope anyway) that when Miles states that they shouldn’t dwell on the past he is really referring to the mid ’90s forward. Nobody appreciates the HISTORY of IMS and The Indianapolis 500 more than me (’13 will be my 43rd 500 in a row) and IMS/The 500 should always honor and celebrate what has come before but when it comes to the “Series” history can have a more negative meaning. Balancing the two will be the hard part……..

  5. Does booking Poison for Carb Day count as living in the past? I just don’t see this band bringing in the 18-24s and frankly, I don’t know but a handful of 35-44 or 45 -54s that really dig this band. Maybe a very minor issue compared to all of the other things to tackle, and maybe I’m’ completely way off base but Poison? Really? They must have been off the county fair and local bar scene that weekend.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: